Clark v. Schieble Toy & Novelty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio; Howard C. Hollister Judge. Suit in equity by the Schieble Toy & Novelty Company against David P. Clark. From final decree on accounting, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.
Final decree was entered below upon an accounting and report of a master. Three suits were originally brought by appellee against appellant upon three distinct patents ; and interlocutory decrees were entered, adjudging that the Clark patent, No. 676,420,. contested in the first suit, was valid, though not infringed, and that the Turner patents, Nos. 930,107 and 930,633, involved, respectively, in the second and third suits, were invalid. Upon appeals to this court the interlocutory decree in the first suit was reversed, with direction to enter the usual decree for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Garretson v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Horvath v. McCord Radiator & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Egry Register Co. v. Standard Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Enterprise Mfg. Co. v. Shakespeare Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- K. W. Ignition Co. v. Temco Electric Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Reynolds Spring Co. v. L. A. Young Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.