Peak v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Bobbitt, J.
I dissent from the majority opinion because appellant herein was not afforded a fair trial for the reason that he was indicted under Acts 1905, ch. 169, §491, p. 584, being §10-3603, Burns’ 1956 Replacement, for falsely acknowledging the execution of a deed before him as a notary public, but was convicted upon evidence which might sustain a conviction for conspiracy to defraud the State but which in no way sustains a conviction of the crime charged in the indictment, viz.: “Falsely Attesting Acknowledgement.”
To keep the issue clearly before us it must be kept in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Robertson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Steffler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. . MarrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Shutt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
- Todd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.