Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peak v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1960No. 29,722Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Bobbitt, J.

I dissent from the majority opinion because appellant herein was not afforded a fair trial for the reason that he was indicted under Acts 1905, ch. 169, §491, p. 584, being §10-3603, Burns’ 1956 Replacement, for falsely acknowledging the execution of a deed before him as a notary public, but was convicted upon evidence which might sustain a conviction for conspiracy to defraud the State but which in no way sustains a conviction of the crime charged in the indictment, viz.: “Falsely Attesting Acknowledgement.”

To keep the issue clearly before us it must be kept in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Robertson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Steffler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. . MarrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Shutt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Todd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API