Associated Wholesale Grocers v. Moncrief
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Presiding Judge.
Associated Wholesale Grocers (employer) appeals the award of unemployment compensation benefits to Samuel Moncrief (claimant). The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the commission) concluded that an item offered in evidence as a business record exception to hearsay was not admissible; that because it provided the only evidence supporting employer’s claim that claimant violated its substance abuse policy, the evidence failed to show claimant was discharged for misconduct, and claimant was thereby entitled to unemployment benefits. This court reverses the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Business Centers of Missouri, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Sureway Transportation, Inc. v. Division of Transportation Department of Economic DevelopmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Greater Kansas City Baptist & Community Hospital Ass'n v. Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. ToddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Phil. Elec. v. Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Associated Wholesale Grocers v. MoncriefMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998