Legal Opinion

Winklebleck v. Winklebleck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1903No. 20,028PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Cass Circuit Court; D. H. Chase, Judge.. Action by Margaret Winklebleck against Andrew Winklebleck and Homer C. Winklebleck, her husband, Erom a judgment for plaintiff against Andrew Winklebleck, he appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.

'Appellees are husband and wife. Ap* pellant is the father of Homer C. . Appellee Margaret sued appellant and her husband, Homer C., in two paragraphs of complaint: Eirst, on a promissory note dated Chicago, Illinois, Inly 1, 1893, calling for $700, payable on demand to said appellee at the Eirst National Bank of Logansport, Indiana, with six per cent, interest, and which purports to have been executed by the defendants in the name and style of A. & IT. C. Winklebleck, in which firm name it is alleged appellant and appellee Homer were then trading. The second paragraph was based upon an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. CaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Dillaye v. ParksNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. WhiteheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. HawkeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1928
  3. Chamberlain v. Deaconess Hospital, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Remington v. GeiszlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Muncie, Hartford & Ft. Wayne Railway Co. v. LaddIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API