Legal Opinion

Caldarola v. Quick

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 26, 1983No. 81 CV 33 (ERN)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEAHER, District Judge.

In 1976, petitioner Angelo Caldarola pled guilty to an indictment charging burglary in the second degree. Asserting that his plea resulted from incorrect statements made by his attorney, the prosecutor, and the trial judge, concerning potential sentencing consequences, petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus setting aside the burglary conviction. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After conducting an evidentiary hearing and completely reviewing the record, however, the court finds petitioner’s claims insufficient to invalidate his guilty plea. For the reasons that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. TateoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  4. Henry Charles Cooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Edward C. Forman v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API