Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Cornell Wardlaw

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1916No. 5721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tom Green County; J. W. Timmins, Judge. Suit by Cornell & Wardlaw assignees of Charles S. Rees, against the Russell Oil Company wherein Clair McCormick and others, as receivers, intervened. Judgment for plaintiffs, and interveners appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Character and Result of Suit.

RICE, J.

As appellees concur in appellants’ statement of the nature and result of the suit, as set forth in their brief, we copy same as follows:

“(1) This suit was originally brought by James Cornell and L. J. Wardlaw, appellees, in the district court of Sutton county, on November 5, 1913, against the Russell Oil Company, a foreign corporation, to recover an indebtedness alleged to be due by such corporation to their assignor, Chas. S. Rees, aggregating $1,053.19 In plaintiffs’ original petition it is alleged that said indebtedness was assigned to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lyons-Thomas Hardware Co. v. Perry Stove Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Orr & Lindsley Shoe Co. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zorn v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Western Inn Corporation v. HeylCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Wolfe v. State Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. James v. Lasco Laundry Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API