Legal Opinion

Prutinsky v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 14, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move for a bill of particulars of five of the six separate defenses set up in the defendant’s answer.

All of the cases relied upon by the plaintiffs were decided in the New York State courts. They are not controlling here. Pearson v. Hershey Creamery Co., D.C., 30 F.Supp. 82.

Contrary to the state court practice applications for bills of particulars of permissive defenses separately pleaded as distinguished from affirmative defenses have been denied. Rockwood Co. v. Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance Co., D.C.E.D. N.Y., 26 F.2d 824, followed in this district…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Hershey Creamery Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Moog v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  3. National Millwork Corp. v. Preferred Mut. F. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  4. Brown v. Fire Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. Knupfer v. Albertson & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Fire Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  2. Dreskin v. ZinkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API