Daniel Cadle v. Diane Cadle
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 DANIEL CADLE, CASE NO. 2:26-cv-00168-JHC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 v. 10 DIANE CADLE, 11 Defendant. 12 13 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff does not assert, or plead any 14 specific facts, to establish this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. See Dkt. # 4. It appears on the 15 face of the complaint as if diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) might be applicable, 16 but because Plaintiff does not state specific facts related to the parties’ citizenship, he fails to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Susan Kanter Sharon Plunk v. Warner-Lambert Co. And Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Tosco Corp. v. Communities for a Better EnvironmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Victoria Rosales Jesus Rosales Rebecca Rosales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.