Legal Opinion · Dissent
Knight v. Knight
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided July 29, 2016No. 2150102Published
1Dissent
MOORE,
Judge, dissenting.
I believe the application for rehearing filed by Gregory Lovett Knight (“the husband”) is due to be granted for the reasons expressed in my special writing issued in this matter on original submission, see Knight v. Knight, 226 So.3d 688, 702-06 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016) (Moore, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); therefore, I respectfully dissent to overruling the husband’s application for rehearing.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Knight v. KnightCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016