Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Hogue

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1996No. 95-0742; Crim.App. No. 30381Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Judge

Appellant’s case was tried in April of 1993. The provision at issue was paragraph 57c(2)(c), Part IV, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984. It states:(c) Proof. The falsity of the allegedly perjured statement cannot be proved by circumstantial evidence alone, except with respect to matters which by their nature are not susceptible of direct proof. The falsity of the statement cannot be proved by the testimony of a single witness unless that testimony directly contradicts the statement and is corroborated by other evidence either direct or circumstantial, tending to prove the falsity…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. OliveroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API