Legal Opinion

Munger v. Supancicz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

It is not assigned as error that the Superior Court erred in denying, or not granting, the motion made by the appellant for a new trial, and therefore all causes for anew trial, which are not of themselves the subject of exceptions, are beyond our consideration. Page v. People, 99 Ill. 418; Lang v. Max, 50 Ill. App. 465.

Among such causes are, insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, excessive damages and the conduct of counsel—if objectionable—during the trial. However exceptionable may be that conduct, it can not be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. People ex rel. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Ditch v. SennottIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railroad v. FletcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Holloway v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Lang v. MaxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Kankakee v. PhippsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  2. Liggett Co. v. StrumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API