Legal Opinion
Taub, Hummel & Schnall, Inc. v. Atlantic Container Line, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 17, 1990No. 28, Docket 89-7136PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge:
The question in this case, here on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, is whether the action of the North Atlantic Continental Freight Conference (Conference) and its member shipping lines, in excluding energy and currency adjustment surcharges from the calculation of freight forwarder brokerage compensation, are immune from antitrust liability pursuant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, 46 U.S.C.App. § 814, ¶ 6 (1982), because such action was authorized under the Conference Agreement that the Federal Maritime…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hallstrom v. Tillamook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Anglo-Canadian Shipping Company Limited, Canadian Occidental Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Davila v. New York HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Taub, Hummel & Schnall, Inc. v. Atlantic Container Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990