Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Quackenbos

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 15, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application to vacate the docket of a decree of the Surrogate’s Cburt in the county clerk’s office and an execution issued upon the decree upon the ground that it was issued against the party as executor.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, S.

The transcript of the decree furnished by the clerk of this court stated “ all the particulars, with respect to the decree, which are required by law to be entered in the clerk’s docket-book where a judgment for a sum of money is rendered in the Supreme Court, so far as the provisions of law directing such entries, are applicable to such decrees,” and, therefore, complied with section 2553 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The docketing of the decree by the clerk of the Supreme Court was without error, and .the entry, that the decree was against the executor of the decedent as such,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Olmsted v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  2. In re the Compulsory Accounting of WaringNew York Surrogate's Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Compulsory Accounting of WaringNew York Surrogate's Court · 1894
  2. In re the Estate of HaarenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API