Legal Opinion

Hide & Leather National Bank v. Alexander

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1900PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cartwright

Josephine P. Alexander, appellee, brought this suit in trover against the Hide and Leather National Bank, appellant, for damages for the conversion of a promissory note for $10,000. The parties waived a jury and tried the case before the court. At the -trial plaintiff proved that she was the owner of the promissory note, which was executed by Godfrey Schmid, dated June 15, 1892, payable five years after date to the order of the maker, with interest at six per cent until maturity and seven per cent after maturity, and secured by a trust deed on real estate in Chicago. The note was endorsed in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. BrosseauIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Young Men's Christian Ass'n Gymnasium Co. v. Rockford National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Justice v. StonecipherIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Cardozo v. FawcettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Kransz v. UedelhofenIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. BruggerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Mann v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API