M.E.I. v. State

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellants, defendants below, appeal from the trial court’s order of full restitution to the victim of a burglary and theft. The issue raised is whether the trial court erred in refusing to set off the amount of *468restitution ordered by the value of the property returned and erred in ordering full restitution to the owner when the owner had been reimbursed by its insurance company. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Appellants pled nolo contendere to charges in two counts of burglary and in two counts of grand theft involving the theft of computer hardware and software, some…