Legal Opinion
Reinke v. Thomson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1941No. File No. 8421PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
In our opinion in the above-entitled cause, 68 S.D. 187, 299 N.W. 868, beginning on page 871, we used the following language:
“Appellant contends that the movement of the motor car from Groton to Turton was the beginning — ‘the first leg’ — of a movement of the motor car from Groton to Win-ona, Minnesota, and therefore was an interstate shipment and was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Courts. Appellant cites and relies upon New York Central R. R. Co. v. Winfield, 244 U. S. 147, 37 S. Ct. 546, 61 L. Ed. 3 045, L. R. A. 1918C, 439, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 1139, to establish his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Reinke v. ThomsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ex Parte WattSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950