Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Nielson v. Board of County Commissioners

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1925Published

1Concurrence

WILLIAM A. LEE, C. J.,

Concurring Specially. — I concur in the order denying the motions to dismiss the appeals in each of the foregoing eases, but not for the reasons stated in the opinion.

It has been uniformly held that a failure to file the transcript on appeal within the time fixed by Rule 26, or some extension of the time as provided for by Rule 28, negatives diligence. (Strand v. Crooked River Min. Co., 23 Ida. 577, 131 Pac. 5; First Nat. Bk. of American Falls v. Shaw, 24 Ida. 134, 132 Pac. 802; Coon v. Sommercamp, 26 Ida. 776, 146 Pac. 728; Stout v. Cunningham, 29 Ida. 809, 162 Pac.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stout v. CunninghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Strand v. Crooked River Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Blumauer-Frank Drug Co. v. First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Coon v. SommercampIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. McCarthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API