Legal Opinion
State v. Hobart
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1980No. 46784PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The petitioner was charged with possession of controlled substances and pleaded guilty after the court denied his motion to suppress the State's evidence, reserving his right to appeal the ruling. That denial was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, Division One, State v. Hobart, 24 Wn. App. 240, 600 P.2d 660 (1979).
The evidence which the petitioner sought to suppress was seized when officers stopped him for questioning at 1:30 on the morning of October 18, 1977. The stop came about in the following manner: Two police officers, in their marked patrol car, were proceeding east on Madison Street…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. GarvinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GarvinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LoewenWashington Supreme Court · 1982
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.