Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Van Atta

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided January 26, 1933No. 8644Published

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, District Judge.

This ease was removed by the nonresident defendant and a motion to remand has been filed by the plaintiff.

It appears from the face of the petition that it is a joint action for negligence against tho removing defendant and the resident defendant. The sheriff made a non est return as to the resident defendant. He had not boon served with summons on the first day of the return term. A petition and bond for removal were filed at a time when only the nonresident defendant had been served with process. Subsequently an alias summons for the resident defendant was asked, was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Ohio R. v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  2. Rodgers v. Gaines Brothers Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API