Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Paul G. Belke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2015No. 2014AP000041-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.17(2), the report of the referee, James C. Boll, recommending that the court suspend Attorney Paul G. Belke's license to practice law in Wisconsin for a period of 90 days for 13 counts of misconduct, and also recommending that Attorney Belke be required to continue to participate in a monitoring contract with the Wisconsin Lawyers Assistance Program (WisLAP) and comply with the contract conditions relating to assessment and treatment.

¶ 2. Upon careful review of the matter, we adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CahillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Christopher A. MutschlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API