Legal Opinion

Van Denburgh v. H. T. Higginbotham, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 22, 1929No. 29789PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On September 29, 1925, plaintiff entered into a written contract with defendant company, an insurance agency in the city of New Orleans, to become manager of its casualty and surety department.

The contract of employment provided for a five-year period, an annual salary of $3,600, and certain commissions on net profits.

On March 31, 1927, the then secretary and manager of defendant company notified plaintiff verbally that his services would be dispensed with from and after May 1, 1927, and defendant was discharged on that date.

The present suit has been brought by plaintiff under article2749 of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Silverman v. Caddo Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. Blodgett Const. Co. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Dunbar v. Orleans Metal Bed Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  4. Tete v. LanauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  5. Curtis v. A. Lehmann & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Georesearch, Inc. v. MorrissDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  2. Brasher v. Chenille, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Ostrolenk v. Louise S. McGehee SchoolLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Aymond v. Haas Inv. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Brandon v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API