Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Borchard Affiliations

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1969PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Fuld.

In the two cases before us, the defendants-respondents challenge the constitutionality of CPLR 3216, as enacted in 1967 (L. 1967, ch. 770, eff. Sept. 1, 1967), on the ground that the legislation deprived the court of its inherent power to control or regulate its own calendar. The new statute provides, among other things, that a defendant, before moving to dismiss the complaint for failure or neglect to prosecute the action, must serve upon the plaintiff ‘ ‘ a written demand ** * requiring [him] * * * to serve and file a note of issue within forty-five days after receipt of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riglander v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. Johnson v. ParrowNew York Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Vivianne Jade Washington v. Investigator Hugh HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  5. People v. DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API