Legal Opinion

Hollywood Orchards Co. v. Dennis, Kimball & Pope

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

On the Merits.

(263 Pac. 66.)

For appellant there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Newbury & Newbury, with an oral argument by Mr. Qus Newbury. For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Porter J. Neff. BEAN, J.

After the testimony of Mr. Cripps, secretary of the plaintiff, to the effect that Mr. Barr, defendant’s representative, had agreed not only that he would put the fruit in cold storage in Portland, hut would use every precaution to see that the pears arrived in marketable condition, counsel for plaintiff moved to amend its complaint so as to allege that the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Longfellow v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Wallace v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hollywood Orchards Co. v. Dennis, Kimball & PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hollywood Orchards Co. v. Dennis, Kimball & PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API