Legal Opinion

Massey-Harris Co. v. Quick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is a suit in replevin. At the close of all of the testimony the court instructed the jury to find for the plaintiff on plaintiff’s cause of action and against defendant on the latter’s counterclaim. A verdict was returned accordingly and judgment entered thereon. Defendant has appealed.

The facts show that on June 7, 1928, defendant signed a written order furnished by the plaintiff and addressed to it for a wheat combine. The order recites: “You will please ship to yourself in care of Chick Quick at Curzon Switch near Forest City on or about the at once, day of 1928, the following: — 1…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Inman Manufacturing Co. v. American Cereal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Kitson Machine Co. v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
  3. Clark v. Shannon & Mott Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Gibbons v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Fairbanks v. Richardson Drug Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Massey-Harris Harvester Co. v. QuickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API