Legal Opinion

Porter v. Megow

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1946No. 4966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

This action was brought by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration pursuant to Section 205(a) and (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925 (a) and (e). Alleging acts and practices of the defendant in violation of Section 4 (a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 904 (a), and of Maximum Price Regulation No. 188 as amended (7 F.R. 5872), the Administrator seeks treble damages in addition to equitable relief.

This Court is without jurisdiction to resolve issues relating to the validity of any order or regulation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowles v. American Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Bowles v. GoebelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Bowles v. KrodelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  4. Bowles v. Heinel Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Shearer v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Price v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Gopher Media LLC v. MeloneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API