Legal Opinion

Hand v. Haiduck

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

The preliminary question raised by plaintiff in opposition to the defendants’ motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice for examination before trial presents the interpretation of section 291 of the Civil Practice Act with respect to the time within which motions of such character may be made. That section reads: “Any question as to the right to take testimony, or as to the time or p ace, or as to the matters as to which the testimony is to be taken, or as to the persons before whom it is to be taken, may be raised by a motion to vacate or modify the notice. The service of notice if made for the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Suchoff v. Crystal Paper Box Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API