Legal Opinion

(PC) Brooks v. Lee

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 15, 2023No. 2:18-cv-00374Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RODNEY BROOKS, Case No. 2:18-cv-00374-WBS-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 J. LEE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff has filed his fifth motion to modify the scheduling order and seeks for the first 17 time to reopen discovery. ECF No. 100. Given the time plaintiff has already been granted to 18 complete discovery and his failure to articulate sufficient basis for modification of the discovery 19 order, I will deny his motion and direct him to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition 20 to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Lee Edward Warren v. Douglas GuelkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API