Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Akwell Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 20, 1981No. 80-809PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff Maurice Ingram appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Defendant Akwell Industries, Inc. Plaintiff claims that the trial court, in determining the legal issue of whether there were triable issues of material fact, exceeded its authority and usurped the jury's duty by resolving the factual issue of whether Plaintiff, at the time of her fall, held the status of a licensee or invitee, and, upon that impermissible finding, granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment

We affirm

On April 19, 1979, Plaintiff went to the business premises of Defendant to deliver cigarettes to her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Folmar v. Montgomery Fair Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Autry v. Roebuck Park Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Osborn v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. McMullan v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. SlatonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tripp v. Humana, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Edwards v. Intergraph Services Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Barrett v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Walker v. Southeast Alabama Med. Ctr.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Marks Fitzgerald Furn. Co. v. Clarklift of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API