Legal Opinion

Bordelon v. Cox Communications

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 2005No. 05-CA-40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES L. CANNELLA, Judge.

The Defendant, Cox Communications (Cox), appeals from the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation (OWC) in favor of the Plaintiff, James Bordelon (Bordelon), finding that he was entitled to temporary total disability (TTD) benefits for four days following the accident and to supplemental earnings benefits (SEBs) thereafter, medical and travel expense, and attorney fees and penalties for arbitrarily refusing to pay benefits. For the reasons which follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Bordelon was employed by Cox as a field service representative when,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  5. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Metropolitan Development CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Quigley v. Harbor Seafood & Oyster BarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Rastegar v. Magnolia School, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Scardino v. LUBALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API