Legal Opinion
Arvinger v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified *941confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Following a Tier III disciplinary proceeding, petitioner was found guilty of violating inmate rule 107.11 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [ii] [harassment]) on two separate occasions and inmate rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i] [possession of a weapon]). Because petitioner did not raise the issue of insufficient evidence regarding the first harassment charge on his administrative appeal, he failed to exhaust…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Nelson v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Grant v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Brooks v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Allen v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sevenson Hotel Associates, Inc. v. StrangesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Agosto v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Rivera v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Wood v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999