Legal Opinion

Leon v. Barnsdall Zinc Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1927Published

1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.

— Action for balance due on a contract. The issues were found for plaintiff under a peremptory instruction by the court. Defendant appealed.

The contract which is the basis of this suit was a sale by plaintiffs of their rights under a contract with the owners of certain lands relative to a mining lease. Defendant agreed to p,ay plaintiff $6000 in monthly installments of $1000 each. This suit is to recover the last four installments.

The history of the transactions between these parties as far as litigation is concerned may be briefly stated as follows: A suit was brought by plaintiffs against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nofsinger v. HartnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Leon v. Barnsdall Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  3. Lawler v. VetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API