Legal Opinion
People v. Holzmann
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided January 5, 2018No. H044507PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrover, J.
*1243Defendant Jason Alan Holzmann was convicted of stalking ( Pen. Code, § 646.9, subd. (a) ) and granted probation. He contends that one of the conditions of his probation-an order that he stay away from the Apple Computer campus in Cupertino-is unconstitutionally vague because it does not specify a distance. As we will explain, a probation condition ordering someone to stay away from a particular location need only express the obligation it imposes in ordinary and understandable terms. The Constitution does not require more. We will affirm the probation order.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant pleaded no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Robinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. G.B. (In re G.B.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- State of Washington v. Frank James Willing, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020