Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sidener v. White

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 7057PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— This was a suit upon a sheriff’s bond, ■•against a sheriff and his sureties. The complaint was in three paragraphs; the second was withdrawn.

The defendants jointly demurred to each paragraph of the ■complaint, first, for want of facts sufficient, etc.; second, because each paragraph states several causes of action.

The defendants, except the sheriff, jointly demurred to each paragraph of the complaint, first, for want of facts sufficient, ■etc.; second, because each paragraph states several causes of action.

These demurrers were sustained, the plaintiff refused to amend, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Kellogg v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. State ex rel. Russell v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  3. Harrington v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  4. Johnson v. Crawfordsville, Frankfort, Kokomo, & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Bank of Rome v. MottNew York Supreme Court · 1837

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hawkins v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. State v. LlewellynNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Wheatley v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Bank of Brookston v. StoutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API