Legal Opinion

State v. Ordog

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 12, 1965PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Haneman, J.

Anthony Ordog (Anthony), Gary Rush (Gary) and Russell Rush (Russell) were indicted for the murder of Mary Tilton. Originally all three pleaded not guilty. The pleas were subsequently changed to non vult. Anthony and Gary later retracted their pleas and entered pleas of not guilty. These two defendants were tried jointly on the theory of felony-murder, but the State did not seek the death penalty. The jury found them guilty and recommended life imprisonment as to both. Separate appeals were taken by the defendants to this Court as of right.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. The PEOPLE v. HesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. Di FriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. State v. PowersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. McCartySupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API