Legal Opinion

Exxon Corporation v. Butler Drilling Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1974No. 16299PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDEN, Justice.

Butler Drilling Company and Production Maintenance Company brought this action against Exxon Corporation, successor to Humble Oil & Refining Company, for damages to their drilling rig and related equipment resulting from a blowout and a fire on October 24, 1966.

On September 13, 1966 Butler commenced drilling a well for Humble under the terms of a Master Drilling Contract. On September 28, 1966 Humble provided a 2-inch Nordstrom valve as called for in the Drilling Order, which was made part of the Master Drilling Contract. Humble had conducted a visual examination of the valve,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ScharrenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. SniderTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Strauss v. LaMarkTexas Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sinko v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  2. General Motors Corp. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Old HH, Ltd.// Mary Henderson v. Mary Henderson// Old HH, Ltd. Christopher Conyers and Yolanda Conyers, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  4. Old HH, Ltd.// Mary Henderson v. Mary Henderson// Old HH, Ltd. Christopher Conyers and Yolanda Conyers, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  5. Old HH, Ltd.// Mary Henderson v. Mary Henderson// Old HH, Ltd. Christopher Conyers and Yolanda Conyers, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API