Ainger v. White's Admrx.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal in Chancery. Heard on defendant’s plea to the hill for want of proper parties, at the June Term, 1.911, Caledonia County, Butler, Chancellor. Decree pro forma, holding the plea sufficient and ordering it to stand and be allowed, holding that the truth of the plea was admitted by failure to ■reply thereto, and ordering, pro forma, that the bill be dismissed. The oratrix appealed. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This is a bill in equity brought by Viola Ainger, a married woman. The defendant filed a plea alleging this fact and further alleging that, during all times material to the case, the oratrix and her husband were living together ns husband and wife, and averring that the husband ought to be a party to the bill, and praying that because he is not the bill be dismissed. The petitioner did not take issue on the plea but set it down for hearing. On hearing the plea was, pro forma, held good and allowed, and the bill was dismissed pro forma.
The oratrix appealed.
The case made by the allegations of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Champion v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
- Case v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Lincoln v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Laird v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fitzsimons v. Richardson, Twigg & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- First National Bank v. BertoliSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- Citizens' Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Server v. LangSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Patch v. SquiresSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.