Legal Opinion

Jorge Cortes-Morales v. Suzanne R. Hastings

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 27, 2016No. 13-13659PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal involves an effort by petitioner Jorge Cortes-Morales, convicted and sentenced for being a felon in possession of a firearm, to invalidate his sentence on the ground that he no longer qualifies for a mandatory sentencing enhancement. Cortes-Morales brings this petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking to obtain the benefit of revised New York sentencing laws, enacted in 2004 and 2009, which had the effect of retroactively lowering the penalties for certain drug offenders. He argues that, as a consequence of these reductions, he no longer qualifies for a mandatory sentencing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Ezell Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. RodriquezSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Antonelli v. Warden, U.S.P. AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. McNeill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dan Carmichael McCarthan v. Director of Goodwill Industries-Suncoast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Vickie SandersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Saxon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Christopher Cobb v. Warden, USP AtlantaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
  5. Dan Carmichael McCarthan v. Director of Goodwill Industries-Suncoast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API