Legal Opinion

Kidd v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1911No. 3611PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Madison superior court — Judge Meadow.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. From tlie 4th ground of the motion for a new trial it appears, that after the case had been called for trial and both sides had announced ready, counsel for the prosecution announced that the State was ready for trial, provided Stephen O’Kelley, a witness for the State, was present; that he had been called, but had not responded. The presiding judge inquired if the witness had been subpoenaed. Counsel replied that he had been, and had promised to be on hand that morning. The judge then said: “If Mr. O’Kelley, the witness, told you that he would be here, you can count on his being here. I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perdue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  4. Isom v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Espy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Clay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Autrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. Dunbar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API