Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Regents of the University of Colorado
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 23, 2001No. 98CA1633PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
Defendants, the Regents of the University of Colorado, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Charles Middleton, and Assistant to the Dean Leon Travis, appeal from the order denying their motions to dismiss the claims of plaintiffs, Veta M. Hartman, Delaris Carpenter, Victor Pearn, and Mark Wolk. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
Plaintiff Hartman was employed by the University as a Program Assistant by the Department of Economics. Before her retirement, Hartman filed a claim for overtime pay. The University reviewed the claim, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Middleton v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Cockrell v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State UniversityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Students for Concealed Carry On Campus, LLC v. Regents of the University of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ramos v. the City of PuebloColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re Bd. of Cty. Com'rs, Cty. of ArapahoeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.