Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Roth v. Fitch

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application for mandamus by the people of" the state of New York on relation of H. L. Both and others against one Fitch, comptroller of the city and county of New York, to compel the payment of an order.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

One Teofil Tuckzwitz, having been indicted by the grand jury for the crime of murder in the first degree, was arraigned before the recorder, and, being without counsel, Henry D. Sedgwick, Jr., Amos H. Evans, and Herman L. Both were assigned as such by the court. The case was transferred to the court of oyer and terminer, where it was tried before Mr. Justice Williams, the trial covering a period from February 15, 1895, to .and inclusive of the 1st day of March, 1895. The defense of the prisoner was conducted by Messrs. Sedgwick and Both only. On the 1st day of March, Judge Williams issued an…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HeiselbetzNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. HeiselbetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. People v. MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API