Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rennie Johnson v. Walter T. Fogg, and the Attorney General of the State of New York, Robert Abrams

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 14, 1981No. 1396, Docket 80-2373Published

1DissentMansfield, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. In my view the proper disposition of this appeal is to remand the case for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Johnson pleaded guilty under the mistaken impression that he faced a maximum sentence of 7 years and, if so, whether he would have pleaded not guilty if he realized that he in fact faced a maximum of 15 years. See Williams v. Smith, 591 F.2d 169 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 920, 99 S.Ct. 2845, 61 L.Ed.2d 289 (1979);1 Kelleher v. Henderson, 531 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1976); Jones v. United States, 440 F.2d 466 (2d Cir. 1971).

The issue is not resolved by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Limmie West, III v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Zachary Morgan v. Ernest Montanye, Warden of Attica State Prison, Correction Officer Steggs, Etal.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Joseph Gruttola v. Edward R. Hammock, Chairman of the New York Board of Parole, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API