Legal Opinion · Dissent

Curry v. Texas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 1928No. 386Published

1DissentFunderburk, J.

The very full and clear statement of the views of the majority of the court upon rehearing makes it unnecessary for the writer, who is not in accord with the conclusions reached, to consume a great deal of space in stating the grounds of his dissent.

There is first involved a question of pleading. Whatever difference of opinion there may be as to whether “½ of ⅛ of .08 cents” is or is not ambiguous, there can be little doubt, I think, that plaintiff’s pleading is ambiguous to say the least, wherein same undertakes to allege either or both mutual mistake and ambiguity. The pleading being…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. San Antonio MacHine & Supply Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Schlottman v. HoffmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hillebrant v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Thomas v. BrowderTexas Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API