Legal Opinion

Roy Lee Davidson v. City of Clinton, Mississippi

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1987No. 87-4217PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Roy Lee Davidson appeals an adverse summary judgment rejecting his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Except for any suggestion that a holder of a current liquor license enjoys no protectable property interest, we AFFIRM on the basis of the analysis of the district court, in its Memorandum opinion and Order of February 18, 1987, a copy of which is appended hereto.

APPENDIX

United States District Court Southern District of Mississippi Jackson Division

Civil Action No. J84-0731(W).

Roy Lee Davidson, Plaintiff, vs. City of Clinton, Mississippi, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This cause is…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Collins v. City of HazlehurstMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. West Alabama Women's Center v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
  3. Steverson v. City of Vicksburg, Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
  4. W. Ala. Women's Ctr. v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
  5. Green v. Cleary Water, Sewer & Fire Dist.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API