Roy Lee Davidson v. City of Clinton, Mississippi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Roy Lee Davidson appeals an adverse summary judgment rejecting his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Except for any suggestion that a holder of a current liquor license enjoys no protectable property interest, we AFFIRM on the basis of the analysis of the district court, in its Memorandum opinion and Order of February 18, 1987, a copy of which is appended hereto.
APPENDIX
United States District Court Southern District of Mississippi Jackson Division
Civil Action No. J84-0731(W).
Roy Lee Davidson, Plaintiff, vs. City of Clinton, Mississippi, et al., Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This cause is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Collins v. City of HazlehurstMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- West Alabama Women's Center v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- Steverson v. City of Vicksburg, Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
- W. Ala. Women's Ctr. v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
- Green v. Cleary Water, Sewer & Fire Dist.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.