Legal Opinion

Luce v. Gerow

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1979No. Docket 78-1011PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, P.J.

This case raises an important question under the no-fault automobile insurance chapter concerning the extent to which § 3135(1) 1 retains traditional tort liability for injuries which are emotionally or mentally based.

The car plaintiff Donna Luce was driving was struck head-on when the vehicle defendant Fred Gerow was driving crossed the center lane of a five-lane highway. Plaintiff received no serious physical injuries in the accident but her husband, who was riding in the passenger seat, sustained serious head injuries which are permanent in nature. Mrs. Luce claims that she suffered an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Daley v. LaCroixMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. McKendrick v. PetrucciMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. TOMS v. McCONNELMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Vitale v. DanylakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Allstate Insurance v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Warner v. BrighamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Garris v. VanderlaanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Garris v. VanderlaanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API