Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1908No. 4000Published

The opinion states the case.

1DissentDavidson, Presiding Judge

(dissenting).—I respectfully dissent from the opinion of my brethren.

Appellant was charged, as agent and employee of a private person, to wit: J. H. Wilder, with embezzling the sum of $55, which money had come into his possession and was under his care by virtue of said agency and employment.

The facts show that Wilder was engaged in the sale of musical instruments at Dublin, in Erath County, and had been so engaged for some years; that J. V. Haley and appellant were both working for bim in the capacity of traveling salesmen, during the year 1906. At some time in the fall of 1906, Wilder…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex parte HedleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. People v. HennesseyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. People v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Ricord v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Pullam v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API