Sament v. Hahnemann Medical College & Hospital
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
The questions presented by the instant motion for summary judgment are whether the non-reappointment of a physician to the staff of a private, nonprofit medical college and hospital constituted state action for purposes of triggering Fourteenth Amendment guarantees, and if so, whether the procedure by which his employment was terminated was offensive to due process.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Sidney Sament, M.D., was initially employed by the defendant Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital of Philadelphia as an assistant professor of medicine…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cardio-Medical Associates, Ltd v. Crozer-Chester Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Clare C. Hodge, M.D. v. Paoli Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Anne Arundel General Hospital, Inc. v. O'BrienCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Quinn v. Kent General Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Holton v. Crozer-Chester Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.