Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. O'Dowd v. Rottman

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 9, 1956No. File 84370Published

1Opinion of the CourtShannon, J.

This is a quo warranto action in which the relator questions the right of the respondents Alvin Gr. Rottman, warden, Herbert J. Borman, burgess, and Jack Coolikoff, sheriff, to hold their re spective offices in the borough of "Woodmont in the town of Milford and to exercise the right, powers and privileges of these offices, respectively. He alleges that the election at the annual meeting of the Woodmont Association was void, because the polls at said election were open, in accordance with the notice given of this election, only between the hours of 11:30 a.m. and 7:30 p.m. daylight time, on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People, Ex Rel. Smith v. . SchielleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Coles County v. AllisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  4. People v. KeelingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  5. Blue v. AlleeIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API