Legal Opinion
In re Magen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 10, 1914No. 3641PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of Morris Magen and another, trading as the Magen Bros. Company. On exceptions to referee’s report sustaining specifications of objection to the bankrupts’ discharge.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The referee recommends that the first, fourth, tenth, and eleventh specifications of objection to the discharge of the bankrupts be sustained. The bankrupts filed 16 exceptions to the referee’s report; the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth being based upon alleged error in specific findings of fact. The testimony amply sustains the findings of the referee to which the second, third, fourth, and fifth exceptions are directed.
[1] The first exception is:
“(1) Because the learned referee erred in finding as a fact ‘that the bankrupts instructed their bookkeeper not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re KnaszakDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1907
- In re MalschickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
- In re LesserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of Gerald A. Mascolo, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974