Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Vienna v. Weymouth

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 16, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

Assumpsit in two counts, viz.: “account annexed” and “money paid” to obtain reimbursement for money paid by the plaintiffs to the Inhabitants of Farmington on account of pauper supplies by them furnished to the wife of the defendant while living apart from her husband. The case is reported on agreed statement of facts,- as follows:

“For the purpose of this hearing it is agreed:
“1. That the defendant is the lawful husband of Marie L. Weymouth and was at the time the supplies mentioned in the plaintiff’s writ were furnished by the Town of Farmington and paid by the plaintiffs.
“2. That the lawful…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malden Hospital v. MurdockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. City of Newburyport v. CreedonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Inhabitants of Brookfield v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1863
  4. Inhabitants of Freedom v. McDonaldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russell v. RussellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API