Doran v. City of Camden
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Collins, J.
This writ of error removes a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming a conviction, before the recorder of the city of Camden, of a violation of “An ordinance concerning inns, taverns and saloons and the.sale of intoxicating liquors in the city of Camden,” passed April 9th, 1890, by the board of excise commissioners of that city. No opinion was read in the cause, but the points involved were discussed in the companion case of Miller v. Camden, 34 Vroom 501, argued at the same term. In that case the jurisdiction of the city recorder to hear…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. GrodeckiPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1943
- City of Rawlins v. Frontier Refining CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Rosencrans v. Township of EatontownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Marcovitz v. CollinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Sterling v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900