Legal Opinion

Doran v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Collins, J.

This writ of error removes a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming a conviction, before the recorder of the city of Camden, of a violation of “An ordinance concerning inns, taverns and saloons and the.sale of intoxicating liquors in the city of Camden,” passed April 9th, 1890, by the board of excise commissioners of that city. No opinion was read in the cause, but the points involved were discussed in the companion case of Miller v. Camden, 34 Vroom 501, argued at the same term. In that case the jurisdiction of the city recorder to hear…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. GrodeckiPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1943
  2. City of Rawlins v. Frontier Refining CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Rosencrans v. Township of EatontownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  4. Marcovitz v. CollinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  5. Sterling v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API